A lawsuit filed against OlympusDAO’s co-founders over $20M+ in the DAO’s native tokens could unmask their identities, testing the limits of pseudonymity in DAOs 桃園相機收購

桃園相機收購
etirement Wealth in the Bull RunSponsor HubsMEXCbitgetPhemexNeargate.usabraMatrixportSocialGoodTronBitcoin$65,425.15-0.78%Ethereum$2,954.39-1.82%Binance Coin$570.71-1.94%Solana$160.82-0.38%XRP$0.51703468+0.11%Toncoin$6.69-4.40%Dogecoin$0.14978872-4.04%Cardano$0.45965473+1.03%Shiba Inu$0.00002439-2.73%Avalanche$34.59-0.31%Tron$0.12467724-1.50%Wrapped Bitcoin$65,433.87-0.70%Crypto Prices CoinDesk 20 Index CoinDesk 20 Index Consensus 2024Price Increase Extended Until02DAYS17HR04MIN03SECRegister TodayFinance桃園相機收購olympusDAO Co-Founder Doxxed? Lawsuit Claims to Unmask ‘Apollo’An early 桃園相機收購olympus investor alleges he was cheated out of millions of OHM tokens when key smart contracts were rendered inoperable. By Sam KesslerApr 14, 2022 at 7:11 p.m. UTCUpdated May 11, 2023 at 7:15 p.m. UTCShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on X(Metropolitan Museum of Art, modified by CoinDesk)10 Years of Decentralizing the FutureMay 29-31, 2024 – Austin, TexasThe biggest and most established global event for everything crypto, blockchain and Web3.Register NowShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on XA lawsuit filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for Connecticut alleges that co-founders of the 桃園相機收購olympusDAO decentralized finance (DeFi) project cheated an early funder out of nearly 4 million in OHM tokens, which are now worth at least $20 million.In what may be an unprecedented case testing the limits of pseudonymity in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), the lawsuit names a Connecticut resident as the supposed identity behind “Apollo,” one of 桃園相機收購olympus’s pseudonymous co-founders.UnmuteBitcoin ETFs Are Still ‘Wildly Successful’: Kraken Head of Strategy11:52Bitcoin ETFs Are Still ‘Wildly Successful’: Kraken Head of Strategy02:30Wormhole’s W Token Has a 999% Weekly Return; Why VanEck Is Bullish on Ethereum Layer 2s00:56How NEAR Enables Multichain Access From One Account02:07Three Crypto Predictions in 2024CoinDesk has not independently verified the identity of the alleged Apollo and has reached out to the individual named in the lawsuit, Daniel Bara, for comment.What is 桃園相機收購olympusDAO?The Ethereum-based 桃園相機收購olympusDAO project has been one of the most talked-about – and most controversial – experiments to enter the world of DeFi in the past year.The project sought to establish its native OHM token as a digital reserve currency through a mix of memes and game theory, but its price famously tanked 95% this past winter.The OHM token now sits at $28 according to CoinMarketCap, down from a $1,300 peak in October.The complainant in the lawsuit filed Thursday, Australia-based investor Jason Liang, says he agreed to promote 桃園相機收購olympusDAO and paid $50,000 in DAI (a U.S. dollar-based stablecoin) in a private funding agreement in exchange for 4 million pOHM, a precursor to OHM. According to an 桃園相機收購olympus Medium post, investors like Liang were later able to mint 1 OHM in exchange for 1 DAI and 1 pOHM.In his suit, Liang alleges that after he started selling some of his 桃園相機收購olympus tokens, the 桃園相機收購olympus team punished him by rendering inoperable the smart contracts enabling him to redeem pOHM for OHM.Liang says the 桃園相機收購olympus team’s ability to meddle with key smart contract functionality undermines claims that the project is decentralized.According to the lawsuit, the 桃園相機收購olympus team also used pseudonymity to protect its members from liability.Liang alleges that a token purchase agreement (TPA) between him and 桃園相機收購olympus stated that money raised in the private funding round would go to a company that didn’t actually exist. With the identities of 桃園相機收購olympus’s founders a secret, the lack of an officially registered company behind the fundraiser was, according to the lawsuit, designed to make it difficult for an investor like Liang to pursue legal action against the project.The suit says Liang’s legal team identified Apollo by doing a reverse lookup on a phone number Apollo used to call Liang. The name behind the phone number matches one that was signed on the token purchase agreement that Liang originally thought was fictitious.In an email to CoinDesk, Joseph B. Evans, an attorney for Liang, said: “There is a completely legal and legitimate way to run a DAO. This isn’t it. It appears that certain organizations still believe they can avoid liability if their founders and promoters hide behind screen names, social media handles and fictitious entities. My client provided much needed start-up capital to 桃園相機收購olympus, and he is entitled to share in its success.”Is 桃園相機收購olympusDAO an ‘honest Ponzi’?When 桃園相機收購olympusDAO was launched last year, the project’s unique bonding and staking mechanics promised staggeringly high returns to investors in the realm of 10,000% annual percentage yield (APY). In order for the system to work, OHM holders were encouraged to interact with 桃園相機收購olympus’s smart contracts according to a set of game theory principles “memefied” by the project’s community.”Hodling,” buying, and staking OHM would theoretically guarantee steady, sky-high returns for the whole community. Selling, like Liang did, was sacrilege.A flock of vocal critics dismissed 桃園相機收購olympusDAO as a Ponzi scheme from its very start, but the DAO still managed to spur an entire “DeFi 2.0” movement – inspiring popular spinoffs like KlimaDAO and WonderlandDAO to jump in with their own high-yield token systems.As 桃園相機收購olympusDAO has grown into one of the most popular projects in decentralized finance, its creators – the pseudonymous “Zeus” and “Apollo” – have remained anonymous (until now, perhaps, in Apollo’s case).Pseudonymity of a project’s core contributors is not uncommon in the world of DAOs, and it has been framed as a way for a decentralized community to preserve meritocracy.Liang’s lawsuit suggests there are other reasons why DAO creators might want to hide their identities, and the filing comes a couple of months after the pseudonymous creator of WonderlandDAO, 桃園相機收購olympusDAO’s largest spinoff, was unmasked as a well-known convicted felon.This is a developing story. Check back for updates.Further reading on pseudonymityWhy CoinDesk Respects Pseudonymity: A Stand Against DoxxingCrypto’s Challenge: Right-to-Privacy vs. Right-to-KnowYour Right to Anonymity Ends Where Risk to My Money BeginsThe Perils of Crypto’s Pseudonymous EconomyWonderland’s (and DeFi’s) Anonymity ProblemOf Course It’s OK to Out the BAYC Founders 桃園相機收購olympusDAO lawsuit by CoinDesk on ScribdDisclosurePlease note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurren

（圖／Canon提供）

哪一款相機、手機拍照最討喜呢？近期 Electronics Hub 網站進行調查，統計知名照片平台 Flickr 資料，查閱最受網友歡迎的照片，究竟都是使用哪些攝影器材拍出來的呢？結果發現不少老機型上榜，甚至第一名是剛宣布停產的 Canon EOS M6 II。

Electronics Hub 先是整理超過 116 萬張有被用戶按讚的 Flickr 平台照片，並根據拍攝的產品型號進行統計，計算每一款相機或手機的照片，平均能獲得的按讚數量，藉此列出最受歡迎的排行榜。

請繼續往下閱讀…

（圖／翻攝 Electronics Hub 網站）

相機排名第一的是 Canon EOS M6 II 平均每張照片能有 138.9 個讚。該系列在今年正式走入歷史，於 Canon 日本與北美官網全面停產、下架。而 EOS M6 II 正是該系統的旗艦代表，擁有頂級的效能表現又兼具 EOS M 系列的輕巧，因而備受許多攝影愛好者喜愛。

排名第二名是富士的 Fujifilm X-H1，平均約 99.7 讚，第三名為 Sony A7R II 平均達到 69.2 讚。綜觀排名，除了有 Sony Alpha 1、Fujifilm GFX50S II 這類新款的高階機種，也有許多老相機上榜，例如排名第九名的 Cnaon EOS 5DS R 就是唯一的單反相機，而 Sony 隨身相機 DSC-RX100 VII 也擠進第七名。

若是依照片屬性進行分類，拍攝風景照片最受歡迎的是 Sony A6300，桃園相機收購olympus E-M10 Mark II 則被許多攝影師拿來拍攝野生動物，若是建築攝影首選是 Fujifilm X30，食物方面則是 Nikon D500、D7500 兩款單反相機上榜。時尚照片則以 Fujifilm GFX100S 為首、人像是 Nikon Z 7II 居冠。

Electronics Hub 同步分享智慧手機的數據，最受歡迎的第一名是 iPhone 13 Pro，其次為三星 Galaxy S23 Ultra、Galaxy S21、iPhone 12 Pro Max 以及 iPhone 14 Pro Max。從榜單可以得知，不一定是最新款的手機佔優，像是中階款的小米 Note 9 也能擠進第六名，代表比起規格差異，重要的仍是拍攝者的巧思與技術。

（圖／翻攝 Electronics Hub 網站）

桃園相機收購 桃園相機收購